The issue of data privacy has become a top concern for consumers with the rise of high-profile data breaches and controversies over the misuse of personal data. Tech giants such as Apple and Google have been taking steps to protect user privacy, including blocking third-party cookies, but the increased privacy measures have created challenges for the online fraud prevention industry. This has led to a shifting landscape in which businesses need to strike a balance between protecting customer data and preventing fraud.
The Cost of Extreme Privacy
While data privacy measures are essential for protecting consumers, there is a cost to too much privacy. The online fraud prevention industry has been struggling as a result of increased privacy actions. The use of technologies such as browser cookies by marketing companies for cross-site tracking has rightly been a concern for privacy advocates. These same cookies are also used by online fraud prevention services for validating user credentials and preventing fraudulent activities. The move to block third-party cookies creates a gap in account security, allowing fraudsters easier access to accounts without detection.
Broadly Defined Regulations
The development of privacy regulations such as the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) has created further challenges for fraud prevention services. The regulations’ definition of “selling personal data” has left the industry trying to interpret these rules. The penalties for violating these regulations are so severe that companies now shy away from one of the ancient concepts of fraud prevention – a consortium. The failure to distinguish between good and bad users has also caused problems for businesses, resulting in the loss of revenue from restricting good transactions or by not being able to stop fraudsters.
Finding a Balance
It’s clear that online fraud prevention and data privacy regulations need to strike a balance. While extreme privacy measures are necessary, they can’t come at the cost of online identity and financial security. The laws need to make exclusions for fraud and abuse prevention companies to use personal data and promote the ethical use of such techniques. Regulatory enforcement is necessary to ensure use is restricted to particular and appropriate purposes. Ultimately, the two industries must work towards a common ground to find a way that balances data protection with fraud prevention.
<< photo by cottonbro studio >>
You might want to read !
- Chinese Surveillance Camera Footage Becomes a Lucrative Target for Cybercriminals
- Why a Delaware Judge Thinks Facebook Should Keep Facing Shareholder Suit on User Data Privacy Breaches
- Microsoft’s Bootkit Zero-Day Fix – A Cautious Patching Approach or a Much Needed One?
- PHP Community on Alert as Hacker Poisons Packagist Supply Chain in Quest for Job
- Rising Concerns: Data Breach Exposes 1M NextGen Patient Records