Defense-in-Depth in Cybersecurity: Adapting to New Challenges
Defense-in-depth, a concept borrowed from military terminology, has long been used in cybersecurity to safeguard systems against various attacks. It involves employing multiple independent protective measures to create layers of defense. While widely adopted in many organizations, the concept requires adaptation as new types of attacks, targets, and methods emerge. Similarly, data security, a concept that has been around for centuries, becomes more complex when applied to cloud storage. As more organizations adopt the cloud for data storage, sensitive information is stored on different technologies with varying control mechanisms and used for different purposes. This complexity necessitates the development of new protection methods.
Risk Reduction vs. Threat Detection
An important aspect of defense-in-depth is the choice between risk reduction and threat detection. Risk reduction focuses on minimizing the attack surface by reducing unnecessary sensitive data processing and storage, limiting access to sensitive information, and ensuring it is not publicly exposed. Threat detection, on the other hand, is centered around identifying malicious behavior, such as data exfiltration or ransomware activity.
While both risk reduction and threat detection are necessary, their combination yields the best outcomes. This raises two questions: Why not choose one approach over the other? What makes data security unique when it comes to defense-in-depth?
To answer these questions, let’s explore extreme versions of each approach. While it is possible to reduce data security risk to near-zero, achieving this would typically involve limiting the business’s ability to store sensitive data or impeding access to a level that hampers innovation. If data becomes unusable, it cannot effectively drive customer support, train machine learning models, or provide insights. Zero risk is often impractical in real-world business scenarios.
A team solely focused on threat detection would face challenges such as alert fatigue and struggles to adapt to ever-changing data environments. Why inundate the team with alerts about suspicious data access when the data is no longer needed? Instead, it is crucial to remove redundant or legacy repositories in the first place and handle data exposure incidents proactively.
The Combined Approach
Combining risk reduction and threat detection delivers the best outcomes for organizations. The first step is to reduce risk to an acceptable level that enables the business to operate without unnecessary exposure. This includes deleting inactive data stores, removing unnecessary access privileges, limiting external access, and ensuring encryption and backup policies are validated.
However, even with reduced risk, ongoing monitoring is still necessary to address residual risk. This includes detecting compromised credentials, guarding against insider threats, and keeping track of data relevance over time. Establishing operational guardrails while closely monitoring activity within those boundaries is essential.
Data security is not solely about risk reduction or threat detection; it is a combination of both. Understanding areas of minimal risk and where necessary risks have been taken allows organizations to focus their efforts more effectively on threat prevention. This may involve deploying additional security measures or prioritizing which alerts to investigate first.
For instance, if sensitive data has been removed from non-essential services or specific teams, continuous classification should be implemented to detect any unauthorized data leaks. Similarly, access policies based on the principle of least privilege should be tailored to different types of data, such as removing European Union data from US repositories.
The Importance of Integration
A comprehensive data security approach cannot solely rely on analyzing static configurations and controls or identifying data leaks as they occur. It must combine risk reduction and threat detection in a way that allows them to complement each other. This requires a continuous and accurate understanding of the organization’s assumed risk, both known and unknown, in order to effectively address threats within that scope.
In conclusion, defense-in-depth in cybersecurity requires adaptation to new challenges. In the realm of data security, the combined approach of risk reduction and threat detection proves most effective. By reducing risk to an acceptable level while actively monitoring for potential threats, organizations can better protect their sensitive data in the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity.
[Word Count: 726]
<< photo by Anna Shvets >>
The image is for illustrative purposes only and does not depict the actual situation.
You might want to read !
- The Evolving Landscape: Navigating Defense-In-Depth and Data Security in the Cloud Era
- Cybercriminals Unleash BBTok Banking Trojan to Infiltrate and Seize User Funds
- Uncovering the Unknown: A New Initiative to Monitor Undermonitored Regions
- Weaponizing Windows Installers: Graphic Designers Targeted in Crypto Heist
- Cygna Labs Corp. Bolsters DNS Firewall Service to Enhance Security Measures
- TransUnion Defends Data Security Following Hacker’s Data Leak
- GitLab Users Beware: Update Now to Secure Your Data